On Writing

Steven Pinker: 'Many of the alleged rules of writing are actually superstitions'

Bad English has always been with us, but clarity and style are far more important than observing dusty usage diktats

Steven Pinker | October 6, 2015

People often ask me why I followed my 2011 book on the history of violence, The Better Angels of Our Nature, with a writing style manual. I like to say that after having written 800 pages on torture, rape, world war, and genocide, it was time to take on some really controversial topics like fused participles, dangling modifiers, and the serial comma.
It’s not much of an exaggeration. After two decades of writing popular books and articles about language, I’ve learned that people have strong opinions on the quality of writing today, with almost everyone finding it deplorable. I’ve also come to realise that people are confused about what exactly they should deplore. Outrage at mispunctuation gets blended with complaints about bureaucratese and academese, which are conflated with disgust at politicians’ evasions, which in turn are merged with umbrage at an endless list of solecisms, blunders, and peeves.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NmEQs12CMc

<more at >http://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2015/oct/06/steven-pinker-alleged-rules-of-writing-superstitions; related links: http://stevenpinker.com/publications/sense-style-thinking-persons-guide-writing-21st-century (The Sense of Style: The Thinking Person's Guide to Writing in the 21st Century) and http://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/steven-pinkers-bad-grammar (Steven Pnker's Bad Grammar. November 3, 2014)>